Skip to main content
Image
By Vivek Nasa

Analysis of Divorce Under the Hindu Marriage Act

Introduction

The Hindu Marriage Act (HMA) of 1955 governs marriages and divorces among Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs in India. It provides a legal framework for the dissolution of marriages under various circumstances. This comprehensive analysis will delve into the key provisions of the HMA related to divorce, the grounds for dissolution, the procedures involved, and the challenges faced in obtaining a divorce.  

Grounds for Divorce under Hindu Marriage Act 1955

The HMA outlines several grounds on which a divorce can be obtained. These grounds are 

  • Adultery: Voluntary sexual intercourse by one spouse with a person other than their spouse. 
  • Cruelty: Conduct that causes physical or mental pain or suffering to the other spouse.   
  • Desertion: Abandonment of the matrimonial home by one spouse without reasonable cause.   
  • Conversion to Another Religion: Conversion of one spouse to a religion other than Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, or Sikhism.   
  • Unsound Mind: If one spouse is incurably of unsound mind or suffers from a mental disorder that makes it unreasonable for the other spouse to live with them.   
  • Venereal Disease: If one spouse suffers from a venereal disease.
  • Renunciation of the World: If one spouse renounces the world and abandons all worldly ties.   

Mutual Consent Divorce :

Procedure for Obtaining a Divorce

The procedure for obtaining a divorce under the HMA involves several steps:

  1. Petition Filing: A petition for divorce must be filed in the family court by either or both spouses. The petition must specify the grounds for divorce and provide supporting evidence.   
  2. Notice to the Other Party: The court will issue a notice to the other spouse, requiring them to respond to the petition within a specified period.
  3. Mediation: In some cases, the court may refer the parties to mediation to explore the possibility of reconciliation.   
  4. Trial: If mediation fails, the case will proceed to trial, where evidence will be presented and arguments heard.
  5. Decree of Divorce: If the court finds in favor of the petitioner, it will grant a decree of divorce.   

Challenges in Obtaining a Divorce

Obtaining a divorce under the HMA can be a complex and challenging process. Some of the common challenges faced by individuals seeking divorce include:

  • Lack of Awareness: Many individuals may not be aware of their rights and the procedures involved in obtaining a divorce.
  • Financial Constraints: The legal costs associated with divorce can be significant, making it difficult for individuals with limited financial resources.
  • Social Stigma: Divorce can still carry a social stigma in India, leading to emotional distress and pressure on individuals to maintain their marriages.   
  • Custody Disputes: When children are involved, custody disputes can be emotionally draining and time-consuming.
  • Property Division: Dividing property equitably can be a complex issue, particularly in cases where there are significant assets.   

Conclusion

The Hindu Marriage Act provides a legal framework for divorce among Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, and Sikhs in India. While the Act has undergone some changes over the years, it still faces challenges in adapting to the evolving needs of modern society. Individuals seeking divorce under the HMA should be aware of their rights and the procedures involved, and seek legal advice to navigate the complexities of the process.   

FOR MORE INFORMATION ON DIVORCE LAWS IN INDIA, SCHEDULE A CONSULTATION WITH VIVEK NASA ASSOCIATES 

Popular posts from this blog

Advocate Vivek Nasa on Motor Vehicle Act 1988 and Traffic Challans

By Vivek Nasa
Advocate Vivek Nasa on Motor Vehicle Act 1988 and Traffic Challans By Vivek Nasa FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT Vivek Nasa & Associates Chamber no 11, Second Floor, Lawyers Chambers Block A, Gurgaon Civil Court, National Highway 8, Gurugram, Haryana 122001, India  Get Directions Phone:   +91 9811896536 Website:   https://www.viveknasa.com Email:   contact@viveknasa.com Facebook Profile:  Visit Google Maps:  Visit Youtube Channel:  Visit  
Read more

Complaint under section 420 IPC not barred even if prior complaint under section 138 NI Act is pending -Supreme Court

By Vivek Nasa
It has been held by Hon'ble Supreme court of India in Sangeetaben Mahendrabhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat that, A subsequent complaint under section 420 IPC is admissible & not barred even if prior complaint under section 138 NI Act is pending or appeal thereto in pending adjudication. Supreme Court of India Sangeetaben Mahendrabhai Patel vs State Of Gujarat ; Anr on 23 April, 2012 Author: . B Chauhan Bench: B.S. Chauhan, Jagdish Singh Khehar REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 645 of 2012 Sangeetaben Mahendrabhai Patel …Appellant Versus State of Gujarat & Anr. …Respondents J U D G M E N T Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J. 1. This appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 18.8.2011 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad in Criminal Misc. Application No. 7807 of 2006, by which the High Court has dismissed the application filed by the presen...
Read more

Recovery of cheque bounce money becomes difficult: Change in Jurisdiction of Section 138 NI Act Cases : SC

By Vivek Nasa
By Vivek Nasa Recovery of cheque bounce money becomes difficult: Change in Jurisdiction of Section 138 NI Act Cases Landmark Judgement by Supreme Court of India changes the way Cheque Bounce Section 138 NI Act cases are filed. In a landmark judgement, the Supreme Court of India has changed he way Cheque Bounce Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act cases are filed.to prosecute a person who had presented the cheque which bounced for insufficiency of funds. Earlier, a case under Section 138 could be filed by holder of the cheque at four different places of his choice including his place of business or residence. But, now after this landmark judgement in the case of Supreme Court of India has ruled that from now onwards a case can be filed only at the place where the branch of the bank on which the bounced cheque was drawn is located. Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. Source :Judis.nic.in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod Versus Stat...
Read more