Advocate Vivek Nasa on Motor Vehicle Act 1988 and Traffic Challans

Advocate Vivek Nasa on Motor Vehicle Act 1988 and Traffic Challans

By Vivek Nasa

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT

Vivek Nasa & Associates
Chamber no 11, Second Floor, Lawyers Chambers Block A, Gurgaon Civil Court, National Highway 8, Gurugram, Haryana 122001, India
Get Directions

Phone: +919811896536

Website: https://www.viveknasa.com

Email: contact@viveknasa.com

Facebook Profile: Visit

Google Maps: Visit

Youtube Channel: Visit

Popular posts from this blog

DIVORCE UNDER HINDU MARRIAGE ACT 1955 Marriage is one of the most significant institutions in our culture. However, as one of the most intricate partnerships, it is challenging to maintain , especially in today’s times where there is an increasing tendency to seek divorces. This is where the Hindu Marriage Act (HMA) assists in preserving marriages and families from disintegration. The Hindu Marriage Act, which came into force in the year 1955, aims to establish uniformity of laws among Hindus. It provides the legal framework required for individuals to file for a divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, as per the sections stipulated by the law. Marriages are among the most complex relationships, laden with emotional and financial investments. The purpose of this act is to safeguard the rights of both the bride and the groom as per the Hindu Marriage Act. Application of the Hindu Marriage Act (1) This Act applies— (a) To any person who is a Hindu by r...

Recovery of cheque bounce money becomes difficult: Change in Jurisdiction of Section 138 NI Act Cases : SC

By Vivek Nasa Recovery of cheque bounce money becomes difficult: Change in Jurisdiction of Section 138 NI Act Cases Landmark Judgement by Supreme Court of India changes the way Cheque Bounce Section 138 NI Act cases are filed. In a landmark judgement, the Supreme Court of India has changed he way Cheque Bounce Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act cases are filed.to prosecute a person who had presented the cheque which bounced for insufficiency of funds. Earlier, a case under Section 138 could be filed by holder of the cheque at four different places of his choice including his place of business or residence. But, now after this landmark judgement in the case of Supreme Court of India has ruled that from now onwards a case can be filed only at the place where the branch of the bank on which the bounced cheque was drawn is located. Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. Source :Judis.nic.in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod Versus Stat...